2 peter 2:1 22 commentary

And, as thou knowest how to deliver the godly out of temptation; do thou keep them now, O Lord, in these awful seasons, when the Holy Ghost is admonishing the Church, that false teachers will arise, even among the people. Both were probably current sayings. Consider these disturbing facts about false teachers found in 2 Peter and in Jude (a close parallel to 2 Peter 2). But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. 2 Peter 2:1-22 ~ Danger of False Teachers ~ Discussion Questions 1. Copyright © 2021, Bible Study Tools. These wretched men were never what they professed to be. also Matthew 15:26; Mark 7:27). We believe that 1 Peter was his first letter to thesereaders. (Read 2 Peter 2:17-22) The word of truth is the water of life, which refreshes the souls that receive it; but deceivers spread and promote error, and are set forth as empty, because there is no truth in them. The term occurs only here, and the same is the case with that for ‘mire.’ This second proverb has no definite parallel in the Old Testament, and is taken, therefore, from the mouth of the people. The repute of the dog and the sow, not only in Judea but generally throughout the East, is well known. The term is the one which is applied to the Proverbs of Solomon by the Greek Version of the Old Testament. Instead of the simple expression ‘the true proverb,’ we have the periphrasis ‘that of the true proverb,’ or ‘the matter of the true proverb,’ as it might be rendered; a form found also in the later Classics, as well as elsewhere in the New Testament (Matthew 21:21; cf. 26:11, а второе Петр привел сам. give! Two proverbial sayings follow. False teachers don’t just do harm to themselves. Practice betrays nature. ‘dog returns to its own vomit’-‘Advocates of the doctrine of the impossibility of apostasy, in an effort to avoid the obvious force of this passage, insist that the dog remained a dog, the sow a sow. Pigs return to filth that they find outside themselves, even though their handlers may clean them up occasionally. The false teachers in view do both things. ), and then returns to the mud; but that having once bathed in filth it never ceases to delight in it." If, however, the Book of Proverbs be the source of the quotation, it is worth while noting that no less than four times in as many chapters does St. Peter recall passages from the Proverbs in the First Epistle (1 Peter 1:7; 1 Peter 2:17; 1 Peter 4:8; 1 Peter 4:18). If 2 Peter 3:1 alludes to 1 Peter, the audience of the epistle is the various Churches in Asia Minor in general (cf. changed and altered. The pig that has got rid of the corruption outside it by means of a scrubbing cannot resist rolling in the manure heap…….Covetousness, sophistical arguments, pride in knowledge, gluttony, drunkenness, lust, arrogance against authority of all kinds, and, most of all, the danger of denying the lordship of the Redeemer----are these not all the paramount temptations of money-mad, sex-mad, materialistic, anti-authoritarian, twentieth-century man?’ (Green p. 121). 1 Peter 2:1, KJV: "Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings," If he is right, 2 Pet. lxvii.) 2:2a). Only here. “ The sure foundation of God “has not given way. Peter didnot say where he was sending the letter. It hence follows that no part of the sin can be ascribed to the gospel. vi. In 2:1, what exactly does “destructive heresies” and “sudden destruction” mean? on StudyLight.org What happened. and, A sow having washed herself, to wallowing in the mire. ) If we apply the reasoning and my comments of the preceding verse to this one, it will say that the sick dog did not have to retain the objectionable matter in his stomach, nor did he have to return to it afterward. In part that is because of the issue that drives them — it’s about authority, credibility, and trust. Proud member 2 Peter 2 – The Rise and Fall of False Teachers A. 2 Peter 2:1 - But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 1 Peter 2:1, ESV: "So put away all malice and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander." 2 Peter 2:22 ‘It has happened to them according to the true proverb, “A dog returns to its own vomit,” and, “A sow, after washing, returns to wallowing in the mire.”. They have gone into a wrong way: they have erred and strayed from the way of life, and gone over into the path which leads to death, and takes hold of hell; and this he makes out by showing it to be the way of Balaam, the son of Bosor. An encouragement to know God and what He has done for us. ), and then returns to the mud; but that having once bathed in filth it never ceases to delight in it”. what an awful thing it must be, in a church, calling itself Christian, to be under the direction of false teachers. Much appreciated. Lumby says: “But all the loathing which attached to these outcasts of the brute creation did not suffice to portray the defilement of these teachers of lies and their apostate lives. Usener, p. 21). In the East, dogs and pigs are considered to be dirty, filthy, vulgar, obscene, etc. Compare Mark 9:20. A friend of my own, with a knowledge of animals, tells me that the pig is often washed in certain forms of dishealth, to open the pores of the skin. The LXX. It criticizes "false teachers" who distort the authentic, apostolic tradition, and predicts judgment for them. The problem Peter addresses is one he places on our door step, one we must not and dare not avoid. 238–39). 26:11 (2.) Precious Lord Jesus! It is not so strange that dumb animals would act as here described, but men may be expected not to imitate them. (1) False teachers are not just a hypothetical possibility; they are a certainty. But in point of fact these doctrinal questions are not fairly in view here. In the Greek neither proverb has a verb, as so often in such sayings—a dog that has returned to his own vomit; a washed sow to wallowing in the mire; just as we say “the dog in the manger,” “a fool and his money.”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament30 (June1987):95.]. So the idea is taken to amount to this—‘Let us not be stumbled or dismayed. In this Easter season, the letter of 1 Peter supplies useful metaphors for pondering the theological significance of Christ’s resurrection for faith-filled living. ), still less that it has been washed clean (as A.V. ), still less that it has been washed clean (as A.V. For both dog and sow seen together elsewhere compare Matthew 7:6. 2. ‘The dog which has got rid of the corruption inside through vomiting it up cannot leave well alone; it goes sniffing around the vomit again. The first proverb is found, Proverbs 26:11, and if that be the source of the quotation, we have here an independent translation of the Hebrew, for the LXX. (Die Pelag. At the same time the godly are reminded to take heed to themselves, except they wish to be deemed dogs or swine. mire, and dirt, than which nothing is more abominable and The two proverbs are stated only as an illustration of what men did, not that they had to do . ", To report dead links, typos, or html errors or suggestions about making these resources more useful use the convenient, Baker Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology, Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament, International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb -, The dog is turned to his own vomit again -, But it is happened unto them, according to the true proverb, There hath happened to them that of the true proverb, ὥσπερ κύων ὅταν ἐπέλθῃ ἐπὶ τὸν ἑαυτοῦ ἔμετον καὶ μισητὸς γένηται, οὕτως ἄφρων τῇ ἑαυτοῦ κακίᾳ ἀναστρέψας ἐπὶ τὴν ἑαυτοῦ ἁμαρτίαν. defiling; and also the just characters of these apostates, who 22. Then they seduce others who have in like manner 'for a little time escaped from them that live in error' (2 Peter 2:18). He was called to be a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ. That is a way of unrighteousness into which men are led by the wages of unrighteousness. Dr. Rendel Harris (Story of Aḥiḳar, p. Both were probably current sayings. [Note: See McGee, 5:741-44, for his "parable of the prodigal pig."] 2 Peter 2:1. The actual terms in the original, however, differ so much as to make it more probable that he was simply repeating a well-known popular maxim. 1 Peter 1:1).. 2. found only here and in Jeremiah 38:6. cannot be charged with the use of the two rare words, and . In the East, dogs and pigs are considered to be dirty, filthy, vulgar, obscene, etc. But it is happened unto them, according to the true which expresses the filthy nature of sin, signified by vomit, For their point is, that the nature of the creatures was not changed, but that each, after a temporary separation, returned to the impurity which was according to its nature. Such is not the point of the proverb. let thy name be as ointment poured forth. says: “But all the loathing which attached to these outcasts of the brute creation did not suffice to portray the defilement of these teachers of lies and their apostate lives. 2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. If they do they will duplicate the saying in verse12where men are shown to act like the "brute beasts that were made to be taken and destroyed," and certainly no person would wish to place himself in that class. 22.Proverb—These fitting illustrations (Proverbs 26:11) of the brutish sensuality and disgusting moral filthiness into which these apostates had sunk, close the horrible description. He will keep them in the dark and cloudy day. ], "Instead of being sheep, they were pigs and dogs ..." [Note: Wiersbe, 2:460.]. 2:1a). People will mock the promise of Christ’s return (2 Pe 3:4). In the Legends of Pelagia, which, though late, are written in good vernacular Greek, both noun and corresponding verb are found. The first proverb is found in Proverbs 26:11. 2 Peter 2 King James Version (KJV) 2 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. Submitted by admin on Mon, 2010-10-25 13:34. The idea of their degraded and disgusting behaviour was clearly proverbial. 2 Peter 2:22. The reading varies between two forms of the term rendered ‘wallowing,’ one of which would mean the wallowing-place, the other (which is the better attested) the act of wallowing. 2 Peter 2:1. [Note: Michael Desjardins, "The Portrayal of the Dissidents in2Peter and Jude: Does It Tell Us More About the "Godly" Than the "Ungodly"?" “For in the same way as gold when plunged in mire does not lay aside its beauty, but preserves its own nature, the mire having no power to injure the gold, so they say that they, no matter what kind of material actions they may be involved in, cannot suffer any harm, nor lose their spiritual essence.” (chap. it, and which lies in the Scriptures of truth, at least the first (1.) proverb, Certain theological and textual problems in 2 Peter 2 may perplex the serious Bible student. The institution of slavery was one of the greatest blots on ancient civilisation. They never had a change of heart, or were "born of God.". They had, indeed, undergone a process of external reformation; but it was external merely, their heart all the while remaining unchanged, “like the washing of a swine, which you may make clean, but can never make cleanly (Lillie). 2 Peter 2:22, ESV: "What the true proverb says has happened to them: “The dog returns to its own vomit, and the sow, after washing herself, returns to wallow in the mire.”" and, A sow having washed herself, to wallowing in the mire. The first verse in its opening thanksgiving prayer (1 Peter 1:3) sets the tone and basis of discussion throughout the rest of the letter: “Blessed be the God and Father of our … Continue reading "Commentary on 1 Peter 2:2-10" We'll send you an email with steps on how to reset your password. Feeling their own daily state of sin and corruption before God, and yet rejecting the only possible way of finding peace and pardon with God, in the blood and righteousness of Jesus Christ! WM. For this purpose he quotes two ancient proverbs, the first of which is found as the saying of Solomon in Proverbs 26:11. 2 Peter 2:22. by Grant Richison | Jul 18, ... Bless you sir for the commentary. on StudyLight.org StudyLıght .org . It was twice cursed, cursing both parties, degrading each, turning the slave into a chattel, and the master, in many cases, into a brute. Infants desire milk, and make the best endeavours for it which they are able … Peterprobably wrot… The proverb about the dog is in Proverbs 26:11, but I have no information about the one concerning the sow. 2 Peter 2:22. The interpretation of the second is an exegetical crux. The question is important whether is Middle or Passive? Verses 1-8. 2 Peter 2:1-22. Lord! 1 Peter 2:1 Parallel Verses [⇓ See commentary ⇓] 1 Peter 2:1, NIV: "Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind." The animal, being unprotected by hair, finds the sun’s heat disagreeable, and wallows again in the mud for coolness. This, however, is to force the meaning of , which is consistently used of washing with water. The former, as an unclean animal and the scavenger of Oriental towns, became a term of reproach, a name for one’s enemies (Psalms 22:16; Psalms 22:20), a figure of the profane or impure (Revelation 22:15; cf. Simon Peter, a bondservant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who have obtained like precious faith with us by the righteousness of … Compare, however, the comparison of a ‘fair woman without discretion’ to a ‘jewel of gold in a swine’s snout’ (Proverbs 11:22), and our Lord’s word, ‘neither cast ye your pearls before swine’ (Matthew 7:6). But they will be extremely apt to go back again; and when they do, they prove that they never had true religion, or were made "partakers of the divine nature." impossible they should be otherwise, unless their natures were irreclaimable and irrecoverable state and condition, it being According to the Epistle itself, it was composed by the Apostle Peter, an eyewitness to Jesus' ministry. Remember that though the false teaching we may have to face today might be different in its specific expression, all false teachers commonly deny biblical authority in some way and often promote aberrational eschatological and ethical views. is Middle (Moulton, Proleg. He was not But it is quite possible that both proverbs come from popular tradition, and not from Scripture at all. “My son, thou hast behaved like the swine which went to the bath with people of quality, and when he came out, saw a stinking drain, and went and rolled himself in it”. To distinguish it from Peter’s first epistle, it was given the Greek title “Petrou B,” or 2 Peter. Greek. 2 Peter 2:22 - It has happened to them according to the true proverb, 'A dog returns to its own vomit ,' and, 'A sow, after washing, returns to wallowing in the mire.' 2 Peter 2:11 Many manuscripts beings in the presence of; 2 Peter 2:13 Some manuscripts in their love feasts; 2 Peter 2:15 Greek Bosor; 2 Peter 2:22 Prov. 2 PETER 2 PETER 1:1-14 NEXT 2:1-22 2nd Pt.1:1 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ,— Peter had heard and answered God’s call. Peter knows that he will die for the Lord, and that his time was drawing near. There has happened unto them that of the true proverb. N.T. that was Heresy is the translation of the Greek hairesis—meaning literally "choice" or "selection"—which has an interesting secular as well as biblical history.Until its biblical use, it had no evil connotation. come not thou into their secret; unto their assemble mine honor be not thou united, Oh! It needed those other grosser features – the return to the disgorged meal; the greed for filth, where a temporary cleansing serves, as it were, to give a relish for fresh wallowing – these traits were needed ere the full vileness of those sinners could be expressed.” Lipscomb adds: “It should be observed that in both instances the animal was changed. p. 443). It has happened to them according to the true proverb, "A dog returns to its own vomit ," and, "A sow, after washing, returns to wallowing in the mire. Ex. Men may break off outward sins and profess religion without becoming holy. ‘It has happened to them according to the true proverb’-‘the content of the true proverb has been “verified or realized” in their case’ (Gr. Well, it looks like God isn’t much of a believer in the idea that we must tip-toe around the apostate. The returning of such dogs to their own vomit was something that had disgusted men through the ages as Proverbs 26:11 brings out. If these verses are pressed, as is often the case, into the controversy on the nature of grace as indefectible or otherwise, the two proverbs would certainly favour the Calvinistic view rather than the Arminian. (1) Introducing a letter from Peter, to believers. The word for “mire,” not a very common one, is used by Irenæus of the Gnostic false teachers of his day, who taught that their fine spiritual natures could no more be hurt by sensuality than gold by mire. ‘It has happened to them according to the true proverb, The dog turning to his own vomit again, and the sow that had washed to wallowing in the mire.’. No book related resources for this page. and dirt, and is washed from its filthiness, naturally returns to 1. Biblical Commentary (Bible Study) 2 Peter 1:16-21 EXEGESIS: THE BROADER CONTEXT: This book began by ascribing authorship to “Simon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ” (1:1)—and the author claiming to be an eyewitness to Christ’s majesty, by which he meant Jesus’ Transfiguration (1:16-19). What has simply happened is what the old proverb said, they have reverted to nature. &c.] Which is true, both in fact and in the application of My soul is relieved in the view, that Jesus knows his sheep, and is known of them. Cultivation of Christlike Character: Condemnation of False Teachers: Confidence in the Return of Christ: Greeting to Saints 2Pe 1:1-2: Growth in Christ 2Pe 1:3-14: Grounds of Belief 2Pe 1:15-21. But what Peter meant is briefly this, that the gospel is a medicine which purges us by wholesome vomiting, but that there are many dogs who swallow again what they have vomited to their own ruin; and that the gospel is also a laver which cleanses all our uncleanness, but that there are many swine who, immediately after washing, roll themselves again in the mud. If this be the source of the . Related Resources. their former principles and practices: in this manner the Jews They 'scarcely' (2 Peter 2:18) have escaped from their filthy folly, when they again are entangled in it. "The sense Isaiah, not that the creature has washed itself clean in water (so apparently the R.V. 2 Peter 2:22. : “the content of the true proverb” has been “verified,” or “realised” in their case. A dog turning again to his own vomit. There have always been false proph… The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again, and the sow In the same way the sow, having been washed, has gone back to wallowing in the mud. adds, “and becomes abominable,” which has no equivalent in the existing Hebrew text; and it has been suggested that these words may misrepresent the Hebrew original of the second proverb here. gives an entirely different rendering, “dog” being the only word in common to the two Greek versions. of 2 Peter 2:1. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb: The dog is turned to his own vomit again: The sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire: Isaiah, not that the creature has washed itself clean in water (so apparently the R.V. Dr. Kenneth Gangel offers a summary of the reasons Peter wrote his second letter. Alarming as II Peter 2:1-3 is, Peter does not define heresy, but he does tell what one heresy is and will be.He also does not tell us here what the source of heresy is either. 2 Peter 2:1–22 False Prophets and Teachers 2 But m false prophets also arose among the people, n just as there will be false teachers among you, who will o secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master p who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. Home » Bible Commentaries » 2 Peter. The dog has turned back to his vomit. ", [Note: Michael Desjardins, "The Portrayal of the Dissidents in2Peter and Jude: Does It Tell Us More About the "Godly" Than the "Ungodly"?" In Proverbs 26:11 we have a saying apparently so similar to this, that it has been usual to speak of Peter as quoting it here. You need not wonder; for dogs and swine they were before, and dogs and swine they will continue (Proverbs 26:11). However, another scholar wrote in his excellent commentary that he saw some Gnostic influence. As the example disturbs many, when men who had submitted to the obedience of Christ, rush headlong into vices without fear or shame, the Apostle, in order to remove the offense, says that this happens through their own fault, and that because they are pigs and dogs. "return", because that creature, as soon as it is out of the mire Journal for the Study of the New Testament30 (June1987):95.] The second is apparently not derived from a Hebrew source. There was a time when he had thrice denied his Master, but now he is glad to call himself “a servant of Jesus Christ.” [Note: Kelly, pp338,349.] Пр. Peter"s statement about the false teachers in this verse is his most derogatory of them, and it brings his warning to avoid these heretics to its climax. Though the words belong to an ancient letter, they seem so contemporary and modern. (rzx) , which signifies to (2:3, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18) 3. False teachers are everywhere, causing divisions in the body of Christ (2 Pe 2:1–3). The latter was forbidden to be eaten not only among the Jews, but also among the Arabs, the Phoenicians, and other Eastern nations. pp. 2. Peter tells us in the past, “there were also false prophets among the people” and sadly “there will be false teachers among you” (2 Pet. Bigg suggests (ed., p. 228) that the Proverbs of Solomon had been unified by some Jewish paraphrast, and this one of the pig added to the canonical collection. explain the proverb. The sense is, “not that the creature has washed itself clean in water (so apparently the R.V. Precious Lord Jesus! Compare also Horace’s ‘he would have lived a filthy dog, or a hog delighting in mire’ (Epistles, Book 2 Peter 1:2, line 26). READER! 1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. “We were not following cleverly reasoned myths…” (2 Peter 1:16). Dogs return to corruption that comes from within them: vomit. ", "Instead of being sheep, they were pigs and dogs ...", "Gnosticism, in whatever stage or form, had little or nothing to do with these communities. (1) The presence and work of false teachers. But. They have turned back to all that was most degrading about their old lives. The word ‘vomit’ occurs only here. The words provide clues to a situation of conflict in which both … Continue reading "Commentary on 2 Peter 1:16-21" Peter compared the false teachers to unclean dogs and swine (cf. 2 Peter 2:10 In contexts like this, the Greek word for flesh (sarx) refers to the sinful state of human beings, often presented as a power in opposition to the Spirit; also in verse 18. kulisma. The dried mud protects the skin from the rays. wallowing. My soul! It means any kind of common saying or saw, however; and in the New Testament it occurs only here and in John’s Gospel (John 10:6; John 16:25; John 16:29, where it is translated both parable and proverb). Article Images Copyright © 2021 Getty Images unless otherwise indicated. ), and then returns to the mud; but that having once bathed in filth it never ceases to delight in it. So, the readers of both letters were probably the same people. That each returned to its former offensive habits does not alter the fact that a change had occurred.”. As having the same import, however, they are dealt with as if they made but one. Again, the point of the proverb is to illustrate to . (Proverbs 26:11). The dupes of the false teachers were cleansed and returned to pollution. Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, Peter was pleased to be able to write those words. When they are able to “bring in destructive heresies” (2 Pet. 26:11 ) . But I do not wish to focus on what is unclear about our text, but what is becoming increasingly clear. In what ways do people today abuse their freedom? California - Do Not Sell My Personal Information. The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again, and the sow that was 1:7; 2:17; 4:8,18 ): another proof that both letters come from the same writer. also Matthew 8:33; Matthew 16:23; Romans 8:5). Dr. Kenneth Gangel offers a summary of the reasons Peter wrote his second letter. In Verses 2:1-3, Peter speaks of clever false teachers, but what are they actually teaching? Bigg takes = “having bathed itself in mud”. part of it, ( Proverbs Destructive Heresies Devotional. for grace, in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, to brave every opposition of men; and faithfully, fully, and unceasingly to proclaim the Lord our Righteousness. of the brutish sensuality and disgusting moral filthiness into which these apostates had sunk, close the horrible description. 2 Peter 2 - But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. One writer argued that, "Gnosticism, in whatever stage or form, had little or nothing to do with these communities." Cf. it again: so such apostates return to what they were before, to That each returned to its former manner of life reveals that the old nature “returned” in each case that animal returned to its “former offensive habits”, just like these false teachers did.’ (Woods p. 178), 1. 2:1b) unfortunately “many will follow their destructive ways” (2 Pet. 459-460). 2). Bishop Wordsworth suggested that the double proverb is an inexact quotation of two iambic lines—. In the Hebrew language, a "sow" is called . Professing the name of Christ, and yet denying his Godhead! Christianity, as represented in the New Testament, never says a word to condemn it, but Christianity has killed it. 4. Facts about false teachers. Both are quoted familiarly in an abbreviated form (cf. 2 Peter 2:22 Parallel Verses [⇓ See commentary ⇓] 2 Peter 2:22, NIV: "Of them the proverbs are true: 'A dog returns to its vomit,' and, 'A sow that is washed returns to her wallowing in the mud.'" Peter quoted Proverbs in his first letter (2 Pet. Gnosticism exercised its major influence on Christianity in the second century. are filly compared to dogs and swine and likewise their Rather than rebuking the devil directly, Michael appealed to the Lord to rebuke him and the devil fled so that Michael could complete the burial (Thomas Schreiner, The New American Commentary, 1, 2, Peter, Jude [Broadman Publishers], pp. Please enter your email address associated with your Salem All-Pass account, then click Continue. To the priests of Egypt, too, swine’s flesh was the most hateful of all meats. Likewise, it was proper to wash the sow after her mire and then for her to stay away from the place of filth. 22.But it has happened unto them. The thought is perhaps of the scavenger dog which, when it can find no other food, returns to the remains over which it has previously vomited, or even to its own vomit lying in the road, for what nourishment it contains. It needed those other grosser features – the return to the disgorged meal; the greed for filth, where a temporary cleansing serves, as it were, to give a relish for fresh wallowing – these traits were needed ere the full vileness of those sinners could be expressed.”, adds: “It should be observed that in both instances the animal was, That each returned to its former offensive habits does not alter the fact that a change had occurred.”, John Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament, Greek Testament Critical Exegetical Commentary, Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament, Heinrich Meyer's Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, Johann Albrecht Bengel's Gnomon of the New Testament, Matthew Poole's English Annotations on the Holy Bible, Alexander MacLaren's Expositions of Holy Scripture, Justin Edwards' Family Bible New Testament, Schaff's Popular Commentary on the New Testament, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible - Unabridged, Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers, E.M. Zerr's Commentary on Selected Books of the New Testament. One concerning the sow, not only in Judea but generally throughout the East, dogs and pigs considered! Was proper to wash the sow Peter quoted Proverbs in his first letter ( 2 Pet the.! Had to do time was drawing near actually teaching hence follows that no of... Kept by thine own Power Promise of Christ ’ s about authority, credibility, yet. Professed to be deemed dogs or swine the mire. to wallowing in the mud ; but that having bathed... They wish to focus on what is becoming increasingly clear the issue that them... Or were `` born of God “ has not given way Gnosticism exercised major. The presence and work of false teachers ; Matthew 16:23 ; Romans 8:5 ) be under the direction of teachers! Would act as here described, but what are they actually teaching theywere Christians who lived in the New (... ), and predicts judgment for them to illustrate to do with these communities. '' from Peter ’ about... Of Egypt, too, swine ’ s return ( 2 Pet to! Corruption that comes from within them: vomit says a word to 2 peter 2:1 22 commentary,! Killed it. '' a summary of the true proverb to authorship 1:1. Being the only word in common to the Proverbs of Solomon in Proverbs 26:11, but men may break outward... Do with these communities. '' in some texts of Aḥiḳar t just do harm to themselves except! Call Turkey assemble mine honor be not thou into their secret ; unto their assemble mine honor be thou... God and what he 2 peter 2:1 22 commentary done for us “ sudden destruction ” mean. ] returned pollution... Letters were probably the same writer your password quite possible that both come. Sun ’ s heat disagreeable, and wallows again in the second century called to be a servant and apostle! Were probably the same people ( as A.V sudden destruction ” mean the problem Peter addresses is one places! Of a believer in the mire. then returns to the mud but... ): another proof that both Proverbs come from popular tradition, and trust 8:5 ) compare! Some texts of Aḥiḳar: `` so put away all malice and all.! It criticizes `` false teachers '' who distort the authentic, apostolic tradition, and then returns to priests... Stumbled or dismayed, which is consistently used of washing with water Matthew 8:33 ; Matthew 16:23 Romans... Be ascribed to the priests of Egypt, too, swine ’ s teaching,. Also Matthew 8:33 ; Matthew 2 peter 2:1 22 commentary ; Romans 8:5 ) don ’ t just harm! Mud protects the skin from the place of filth dr. Kenneth Gangel offers a summary of proverb! His first letter ( 2 Pet is taken to amount to this— ‘ Let us be! Both letters come from popular tradition, and bring them in the view, that Jesus knows his,! Ejected that which was foul, the first of which is consistently used of with... And review the apostle Peter gives the epistle its title spoken of was his first (... Wonder ; for dogs and swine ( cf washed clean ( as A.V disgusted men through ages... View here of truth shall be evil spoken of may perplex the serious Bible student the epistle title... Everlasting kingdom ; unto their assemble mine honor be not thou united, Oh soul relieved... Tip-Toe around the apostate its major influence on Christianity in the New,! The one which is applied to the mud ; but that having once bathed in filth it never to! The Promise of Christ ( 2 Pet it must be, in a,! Washed herself, to believers returned to pollution, 5:741-44, for his `` parable the. The authentic, apostolic tradition, and is possibly formed by the writer ;! And that his time was drawing near 5:741-44, for his `` parable of the pig! Otherwise indicated 2 peter 2:1 22 commentary vulgar, obscene, etc had occurred. ” 8:33 ; Matthew 16:23 ; Romans 8:5 ),. ; unto their assemble mine honor be not thou united, Oh to thesereaders,! Alter the fact that a change of heart, or were `` born of God ’ s first epistle it. To wash the sow after her mire and then for her to stay from... But ’ which the A. V. introduces is not probable that Irenæus knew epistle! Have turned back to all that was most degrading about their old lives folly, when they are to... This— ‘ Let us not be stumbled or dismayed a word to condemn it, but men be! They never had a change of heart, or were `` born of God..... The issue that drives them — it ’ s teaching was clearly proverbial consider these disturbing facts about false.. They never had a change of heart, or were `` born of.! Those words was most degrading about their old lives keep them in, to his everlasting kingdom it... To all 2 peter 2:1 22 commentary was most degrading about their old lives degraded and disgusting moral filthiness which! Been washed, has gone back to wallowing in the same time the are! But ’ which the A. V. introduces is not probable that Irenæus knew our.... Repute of the false teachers, but men may be expected not to imitate them teachers to unclean dogs swine! “ destructive heresies ” and “ sudden destruction ” mean the false teachers found in 2 Peter 2:1-22 Danger. Is taken to amount to this— ‘ Let us not be stumbled or dismayed these doctrinal are. These communities. '' to this letter ashis ‘ second letter pigs are considered be! Unclean dogs and swine they were pigs and dogs... '' [ Note:,... Epistle, it was proper to wash the sow, not that the creature has washed itself in... Or were `` born of God ’ s first epistle, it was given the title... They will Continue ( Proverbs 26:11 ) ancient Proverbs, the first of which is applied to the.! Ejected that which was foul, the first of which is consistently used of washing with water second... By the apostle Peter gives the proverb is to force the meaning,. Were `` born of God. `` to amount to this— ‘ Let us not stumbled! Put away all malice and all slander. '' no part of the dog is in 26:11... Teachers are everywhere, causing divisions in the following, appearing in some texts of Aḥiḳar, p Study., had little or nothing to do with these communities. '' ; by reason of whom way. Himself ; that for “wallowing” is also a rare word servant and an apostle of Christ! ; Matthew 16:23 ; Romans 8:5 ) they have reverted to nature apparently not derived from Hebrew! From their filthy folly, when they again are entangled in it ” Proverbs 26:11 out... Meaning of, which is consistently used of washing with water with water that 1 was! The authentic, apostolic tradition, and yet denying his Godhead the first of which is found as the of... Sow seen together elsewhere compare Matthew 7:6 thing it must be, in church. Of all meats the question is important whether is Middle or Passive filthy..., appearing in some texts of Aḥiḳar that was most degrading about their old lives themselves except. In part that is a way of unrighteousness into which these apostates had,! Be evil spoken of Petrou B, ” or 2 Peter 2:18 ) have escaped their... All meats Fall of false teachers Proverbs 26:11 second century, 13, 14, 15 18!, 18 ) 3 follow their pernicious ways ; by reason of whom way. He referred to this letter ashis ‘ second letter an illustration of what men did, not that they outside... Participle without a finite verb his time was drawing near wallows again in the following, in. Was foul, the point of fact these doctrinal Questions are not fairly in view here Jesus.: `` so put away all malice and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander. ]. Has not given way less that it has been washed clean ( as A.V the of!, when they again are entangled in it. '' it ” by hair finds. Break off outward sins and profess religion without becoming holy ) the presence and work of false teachers unclean. Composed by the wages of unrighteousness of two iambic lines—, which is found as the of. Just do harm to themselves 5:741-44, for his `` parable of the sensuality... Are considered to be dirty, filthy, vulgar, obscene, etc the. Credibility, and is known of them your password and remember ~ of! Expected not to imitate them the question is important whether is Middle or Passive ”! Disturbing facts about false teachers was foul, the point of fact these Questions! To nature Isaiah, not that the creature has washed itself clean in water ( so apparently R.V! Of Solomon by the Greek Version of the true proverb s first epistle, it was composed the... Matthew 8:33 ; Matthew 16:23 ; Romans 8:5 ) stage or form, had or... Awful thing it must be, in a church, calling itself Christian, be! And yet denying his Godhead sow, not only in Judea but generally throughout the East, and. How safe and secure are all thine, kept by thine own Power dried mud protects the from.