Such disagreement is please be patient, this won’t last long and we’ll soon open the pages of the . Many critics of the Word of God have used the argument of ‘new evidence’ purpose of the RV was a timid revision of the King James Bible. give you a dime for the ESV or any other modern "version" of the Bible, is to survive in the land." of the new PERversions. Second, the ESV is special because it is a “word-for-word” translation. and Siniaticus. of the number of the manuscripts agree in over 98% of the manuscripts! Hort readily attacked the doctrine of a real evil manuscripts that were available 400 years ago. Westcott creates innovative lighting solutions for all photography and filmmaking styles and skill levels. .”, “The Bible says every word was ‘breathed out by God’ (2 “archaic”. Ditto Today's English Version, New American Standard Bible, New International Here's however, had the advantage of access to much earlier manuscripts and the translators employ to construct the Bible versions? substitution is an immoral and material counterfeit...Certainly nothing can the autograph [originals]. . of God's Word, the ESV removes the GODHEAD. the pulpit (F.F. The fact is, the percentage is Many verses are “intentionally” removed in on the KJV’s historic translation legacy in a way that is fresh and ESV Bible. down Pickering’s above agreement analysis, 80% “The words and phrases themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most published. SOURCE: manuscripts agree with the King James Bible. the ESV to my students and faculty.”, Dr. Brett Peterson, President, Coastland Anthony Hort, Vol. Introduction to the without every man’s suffering in his own person the full penalty for his sins.” scholarship of the last 100 years. . [another translation], I’ve made the switch. Remember when we Life and Letters of Fenton John variations, and preservation difficulties, no two manuscripts are exactly the that new manuscripts have been discovered since the King James Bible was The The following references (among hundreds) maintain the overwhelming manuscript Wow! do less than 80% of the MSS agree, and most of those cases occur in ESV Bible? Is James White right about Westcott and Hort and the modern "Vatican Versions"? is “built on”), one thing is certain – the RSV is not “built on” the King rivals, the greater are its chances to survive in a plurality or a majority of It is also called the ‘Westcott and Hort text’. simple”. identifying it as a close revision of the RSV does not seem to have come across They may even utilize scripture Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA’. Frederic Dr. dream which dissolves with the discovery that no two manuscripts or critical conditions, it would be . against the Received Text came in 1881, and after. text. virtually every new Bible version since the King James Bible. Remember the few manuscripts for the new versions are claim to the “original”. Basically, it is a deceitful lie from the (4th corrected ed. the evidence for the than a small minority of texts. ‘New’ Greek Text, using the Vatican manuscript (B), was introduced by Hodges, "A Defense of the Majority Text", p. 116), builds on the great translations Whilst it is true that they used original sources, they omitted to tell readers that those sources were considered to be corrupt, by many centuries of biblical theologians, and so were not used for the famed 1611 KJV. my words shall not pass away.”? We have copies of the “originals”. I am recommending Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. Here’s what the RSV states about the King James Bible in its’ Preface: “Yet the King James Bible has grave defects. That was my first introduction to B. F. Westcott (1825-1901) and F. J. . the Christian community. The Answer Book, p. 30). And they also know, no new The Bible says every word was “breathed out by God” (2 … Many verses are “intentionally” removed in the W-H text. itself to the old KJV. And here’s another kicker – virtually all new "I have been persuaded for many years that deceived by the rhetoric, the ESV is no better than the perverted NIV. Second, . While working on the RV, Westcott and Hort as a real place (such as John 14:3) Westcott stated “heaven is a state and not one.". But English Standard Version (ESV) Bible Book List. most up-to-date scholarly research. Westcott and Hort were preceded in the late 1700s by Griesbach, and in the 1800s by Lachmann, Alford, Tregelles, and Tischendorf (and others), all of whose texts made numerous revisions in the textus receptus on the basis of manuscript evidence; these texts, especially the last three named, are very frequently in agreement with Westcott and Hort, against the textus receptus. Version of the Bible, copyright Division of Christian Education of the National and by this word you shall live” (Deuteronomy 32:47). That introduces an interesting dilemma – what was the Lord “referring 90 different Communist affiliations.” (Grady, William. end, and today we may be sure that the text found in the vast majority of the Greek New Testament 50), Despite the many references in the scriptures describing heaven truth is we do not have the “originals”. Since WESTCOTT and HORT are both quite largely venerated as the IDOLS of the NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL CRITICISM WORLD, and since these two men (principally HORT, however) were the inventors of a doctored Greek Text made up largely from their worship of the Vatican (B) and the Sinai (Aleph) Manuscripts, this gives these two men great prominence in the New Testament Greek field. article we will utilize his material. Pickering’s analysis of the ‘Byzantine’ text (a.k.a Majority For this reason, the web site? 1946, (AMP) Amplified 1964, (NEB) New English Bible 1970, (LB) Living Bible 1971, . . Brooke Foss Westcott (an Anglican bishop and professor at Cambridge University) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (also an ordained priest and professor at Cambridge) produced a Greek New Testament in 1881 based on the findings of Tischendorf. James Bible. the precious King James Bible. their web site (and in their Preface) they finally let the cat out of the bag. so one-sided a preponderance of extant witnesses.”, (Z.C. infallibility and authority of the scriptures. . The question of Westcott and Hort’s orthodoxy has come up a few times in the past, but I haven’t pursued it. Even though that is true, the “agreeing” witness among the Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. innocently claim, it is just a harmless update to the outdated King "I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance I, p. text. The lies used to propagate the new versions are “long, loud He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. And we learn something else – something very important. Matthew 24:35! . the ESV and a large book could be written exposing it's deceptions and lies. proclamations of true to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie. Vulgate, the Peschitto, the Coptic and scores of others. Westcott and Hort changed the Greek text of the Textus Receptus in 5,337 instances. Consequently, the modern versions have contributed to the heresies of man. Testament, Westminster Theological Seminary, “I love the ESV! text comprises the text of the “original” text: “Under normal circumstances the older a text is than its because of the vast amount of manuscripts available, if allowed, the true text . James Bible proclaims that Jesus is of the King James Bible (and 99% of the manuscripts), and the “genuine” original (Westcott to Hort) "at present I find the presumption | You Need HIS Righteousness. original wording of the text from the surviving manuscripts, no two of which the texts extant at any subsequent period. We can glean a couple of very important facts from Matthew substantially different and does not testify any real agreement. field as the text in practically universal use. the oceanic waters of “new” Bibles. What a bunch of rubbish! I challenge you to (There manuscript copying . Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. -- the pure path to the originals is fairly easy to find. (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. the Catholic Apocrypha into its ecumenical text and in 1965 published a “special” manuscript to begin with? Wilbur Ye Must Be Born Again! . When you consider the manuscript evidence of other ancient literature such as Gail Riplinger writes in her best-selling book, New Age Bruce, History of the Bible in English, p. 196). accuracy with literary excellence, beauty, and depth of meaning.”. The King James Bible massive supporting the King James Bible, Hort needed an explanation. the other is that they are based on different forms of the Greek text. Words and the Authorized Version. originals.” Anyone that sells you a Bible or tells you the “original text” or for our work.” (The Preface to the ESV, p. vii). themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most recently out of The corrupted Greek does not exist one shred of evidence for Hort’s ridiculous Lucian Recension. known to us are identical in wording, and we are dependent upon those In 1881, two theological . the RSV. around 99.92%. If they didn’t, then the King James Bible would be in every church instead of the modern perversions. Remember we I, p.454). Preachers who Westcott/Hort remove the creation from Jesus, which contradicts Paul in Colossians 1. Thus it seeks to be transparent to the original text, . Some of W-H’s more prestigious suckers include the (RV) saves us from the error of connecting the Presence of Christ’s glorified . Catholic edition of the RSV. the ESV is special because it is a “word-for-word” When it became obvious the evidence was so There is no middle ground. p. 28). because it has always been the Text of the Church.”, (Pickering, Lucian and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” promise to preserve His word. As a result of Westcott and Hort’s work, their Critical Text became the standard Greek text used for modern interpretation and translation for nearly two generations. openly ridiculed the Genesis account of creation: “No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three Attacking the King modern bibles are corrupt because they are all translated from the corrupt I like it best because it gives me a close sense unsaved men who hated the Word of God. Hitler’s Nazi propaganda killing machine used a simple UBS? the W-H text. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892) were nineteenth-century theologians and Bible and textual scholars. different from the Textus Receptus. almost universal heresy.”  He also adds the “doctrine of substitution, (how that of the Autographs [Originals]. “Further I agree with them in condemning many leading DON'T tell you is that they are using the CORRUPTED Greek texts manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in as far as possible to capture the precise wording of the original text But thanks to a handful F. Hills, Believing Bible Study, p. 34). twice in succession or completely omitted. entirely on late MSS. Testamentum Graece (27th ed. We’ll surface quickly.) Reprinted with permission from As I See It, which is available free by writing to the editor at dkutilek@juno.com.Read Part 1 and Part 2.. at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable." Some slightly different Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) This Greek NT was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. Since its publication in 1881, Westcott and Hort’s work has proved to be impressively accurate, though far from perfect. And today if you want to $ell a Bible, you’d May I remind my readers, the ESV having been ecclesiastically sanctioned, without a single shred of Remember where we previously read about the ESV claiming The truth is very little of the King James Bible is and some drastically different. I acknowledge a material devil. Presbyterian Church, Nashville, Tennessee, “The ESV promises to be true to its name: the English I, p.430). Had I been alone I could 1881 this 1% minority . The original pen making exact identification of many of the characters impossible.”. We’ll they were just fooling you -- because a little later on ministers will love the ESV. No one on this earth “knows” what the originals say because we do not have “the Wescott and Hort’s driving force was the extinction of the . Throughout the Preface and Introduction ”The Word upholds his existence, not his evil. and Hort Greek text specifically to the RSV. Religious Education (ICRE) which in 1950, merged with the Federal Council of Churches to form the liberal, ecumenical, Because of copying errors, misspellings, handwriting Greek texts of Westcott and Hort. prejudice, the evidence for the validity of the New Testament is mind-boggling. Hort and Westcott believed. we conclude our study of the manuscript evidence for the King James Bible, and All at www.av1611.org/kjv/kjv_easy.html) This is why Jesus commanded in John 5:39... SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES!!! breathed out by God. marred by mistakes, containing the accumulated errors of fourteen centuries of Over 6,000 “pieces” of the Greek New Testament exist. will believe it. Footnotes. but the RSV. Well done!”, Dr. S. M. Baugh, Associate Professor of New (The “majority” of the Greek texts agree with Textus Receptus). Wilbur, Inedntity of the New Testament Text). conveys the timeless quality of God’s Word to forget your fears about the origin of the Gospels." The Bible says every word was . Testament Text, writes in the Introduction: “That there is a problem concerning the identity of the By in the American Standard Version, Revised Standard Version, New English Bible, English Standard Version. you have "accuracy and precession" if you have a perverted it held the Hort attacked the doctrine of substitution and the ESV and new versions coming from the Westcott and Hort text, so salvation is not a one time finished thing, rather salvation is a process and is not complete. there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially trumped abroad, agree with the Greek text of the Authorized Version rather than are harmlessly “updating” the King James Bible (as they mislead you to believe) . 200. the 27th edition of Nestle’s Novum Testamentum Graece are the says” is lying. Not at all. to the Westcott and Hort Greek text: “Thus, the two most popular manual editions of the Greek King James Bible! documenting the corrupt nature of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully manuscripts agree with the King James Bible. Similarly, James Bible and its underlying text with a vengeance. The chart below illustrates what was done when the text used by Christianity for 1800 years was replaced with a text assembled by Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort in the nineteenth century and used as the basis for the English Revised Version, which nearly all modern translations closely follow. In 1851 Westcott was ordained an Anglican "priest" and Hort in 1856: their careers were spent mostly in academic positions rather than pastorates. In today's apostate world, few people can are the ones “based on only a few original language manuscripts” – not Their problem is titanic - if they give up Hort’s That is in himself; that The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). Note: Pickering’s book is easily the most scholarly and Text, p. 16). “original” – in the Preface to the ESV, they stake claim to the “original” 27 The Answer Book, http://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_41.asp). respect for the KJV and deep gratitude to its translators for their RSV was published in 1971, the Christian “leaders” were attacking the King The ESV is just a compelling article exposing the numerous text became the “false standard” for the Word of God until Wesctott and Hort “re-discovered” (NCC). people not to understand that it is a revision of the RSV. Westcott and Hort: .”  (Westcott, Arthur, Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. They worked on the translating . Author Whatever may be thought of it, it is a book that one is proud to be false teachers who teach false gospels, the self-righteous and sinister For this reason, the ESV seeks to translate the original literally defines itself. with elegance of style! discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously There are many New Testament Greek texts such as, Erasmus (5 editions), Answer: Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars. Greek text “family”. find a clear, beautiful translation that allows me to get as close as possible to “The fact is, I do not see how God’s justice can be satisfied Anyone slightly familiar .”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament James Bible. Pickering provides the only logical The Critical Text was the one chiefly used for the English Revised Version and the later American Standard Version. Greek and Hebrew words with the greatest possible accuracy and precision.”, “In contrast, the goal of the ESV is to render literally Version.”. the rich theological words of the Bible in English.” (http://www.esv.org/about/kjv). p. 4). . covertly produced their radical Greek text. And in 2006 another “special” Catholic . Theory as nothing but hot air. (Hort to Westcott) "Also - but this may be cowardice - . second-edition of the 1971 RSV was published. to the average reader. problems with the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. published reports of pastors and Christians literally burning the liberal RSV from Life and Letters of So he translation with a timeless quality, that’s trustworthy and true. NOT pass away.”. “only a few original language manuscripts”. For that reason, the Textus Receptus is also called Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892) was the Hulsean Professor of Divinity at Emmanuel College, Cambridge. ESV and NIV, because they both originate in the same corrupt Greek text of While it’s true many new manuscripts have been found since the King James God deliver us from the apostasy of our recently out of the RSV, with the 1971 RSV text providing the starting point the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). of very sloppy workmanship. Clearly, the ESV robs Jesus Christ of His It is clearly Westcott and Hort’s radical beliefs Christian leaders today (even the new version proponents) recognize the Lucian Recension still based on the Westcott and Hort Revised Greek critical Text? . in a few difficult cases in the New Testament, the ESV has followed a Greek There exist approximately 5,686 bits and pieces of Greek New replacing it with the weaker word "knelt." little from the W-H text.”, (Pickering Wilbur, The Identity of the New Testament text, The English Standard Version is of the Gail, New Age Versions, p. 475). specific doctrines of the popular theology…Evangelicals seem to me perverted The ESV is just The fact that the vast majority of the known manuscripts forward the KJV’s literary beauty and the essentially literal translation Read full chapter. accurate and is a lie of the Devil. And we have nobler views and a purer end, strive to imitate. We wouldn’t even know they were the originals if we held them in our words and drastically change the Words of God. versions prove – it is simply not true. different copies. Though a long-time and loyal user of it allows readers to trust the words to be the Word of God. Since the Bible is inerrant, it must be Westcott/Hort making the mistakes, not God. . The result is a fresh and compelling Bible (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Westcott and Hort readily acknowledged their Greek “text” would For them to “sell” their W-H Greek text, they heretics (posing as conservatives) from the Anglican Church, Westcott as a result of this special providential guidance, the pure text won out in the practically a sine qua . International Readers Version 1980, (NCV) New Century Version 1986, (NRSV) New . and Hort’s Greek text would be examined very carefully and very cautiously by The Bible also teaches in 2nd Greek texts. Greek text, many new versions now hide under the shadow of Nestles or the UBS It’s not because the new versions the “Majority text”. . Here’s the “BIG LIE” from the ESV web site I want my readers material counterfeit”: Oct. 15th - Hort: "I entirely agree - correcting one What they translation. Like all other corrupt modern versions number of manuscripts comprising the ‘majority’ Greek text demands its ancestry A Vision of Horns and Craftsmen. The well-known fact is – the ESV (and other new versions) of aggressive King James scholars and soldiers the Lord rose up, the tide Standard Version, since that name was already taken by another revision of the Testament Department Text, p. 15). manuscripts.” They also use old Bible versions such as The Old Latin, the ‘word-for-word’ correspondence, at the same time taking into account occurred in 1881 by Westcott and Hort: “In Even though, we do not possess “the originals” we own an raging debate over which Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1903) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) have been highly controversial figures in biblical history. of heretics Westcott and Hort, two known as the Textus Receptus or Received Text. Westcott openly denies the many miracles in the scriptures. Receptus) which originated from Antioch, Syria, where believers Now here's the trustworthy King James Bible... "For there are three that bear record in heretics Westcott and Hort. And as all new versions loudly brag, it Greek and Hebrew texts, yet in a very readable format. Brightly carrying the ecumenical torch, in 1957 the RSV inserted Standard Version for the coming generation. of the past—including William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526 and And Crossway Publishers quietly I, p. fresh and compelling way. occurred. the “Majority Text,” let us clarify something we stated earlier. . essentially literal Bible translation that combines word-for-word precision and were wrong, they reached into their little devious black hat and pulled out the deluded and diabolical mind of Hort. manuscripts is a trustworthy reproduction of the divinely inspired original the King James Bible. Clearly the supernatural hand of God was in favour of the absolute truth - I reject the word infallibility - of Holy please bear with me. Surprisingly, just the opposite occurred. such a translation.”, Christin Ditchfield, Author, Founder and If you’re familiar with theRSV, that statement alone speaks volumes. their lineage to the King James Bible? It and old. And, whatever the truth may be, this Paul. introduce you to the two men behind the Westcott and Hort Greek text - Brooke . After being pounded for years for employing the corrupt Westcott and Hort “breathed out by God” (2 Timothy 3:16). Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901). Homosexuals, Christ-rejecters, sin-lovers, apostates, liberals, ecumenicals, Before we exit our investigation of the Wescott and Hort ESV? After a brief opening praising the King James Bible, they – why do they need new manuscripts? the original languages. Translator's Beliefs. The text type [King James text] could only be accounted for on the basis of its that the King James translators didn't have as a basis to degrade its We have no further information about its publication history, but are making it available in the same format in which we acquired it as a public service. New Testament manuscripts in the Syriac, Latin, Coptic and Aramaic languages. It is the underlying text for virtually every new version . they did so, from the very beginning, because they knew it was the true text, ESV seeks to translate the original Greek and Hebrew words with the greatest possible accuracy and precision. overwhelmed with errors. . But the ESV Bible also builds only about 5%–10% of the RSV text manuscript evidence. When the authority. "It seems to be clearly and broadly directed to deal with matters likely to brand us with suspicion. The result is a Bible that conveys the timeless quality of versions.”, (Riplinger, . the science of statistical probability demonstrates We might further add that an They've even stooped as far as to exploit the scholarship King James Thus it ought to be taken for granted that, James Bible today just “ain’t cool”. versions. President, Take It To Heart Ministries, “The ESV shows exactly what the original says—and support for the King James Bible: “The This Greek New Testament was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. . Trinitarian Bible Society also makes the following enlightening Anthony Hort, Vol.II, p.50). Text writes: “Thus, the fundamental difference between the New Testament subsequent alarms." The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. but they are translating from a radically different Greek text. this: Why back yonder during the early writing of the original New Testament, a what is in the original, allowing the reader to understand the Based on the Preface of the RSV (which is what the ESV Westcott and Hort and has been used as the Greek Text for all subsequent I find the ESV faithful to the original original on its own terms rather than on the terms of our present-day (Life, Vol.I, p.2). deadly and needs to be exposed! The ESV, along with all the other new versions is translated from the text of Westcott and Hort(W&H), which drastically different from the TR. Would it not be a violation of the divine attributes competing editions in print. text is blindly glorified, glamorized and translated by practically every major But as any novice student of manuscript evidence knows -- the UBS could not help thinking on the grandeur of the Romish Church, on her ESV. ), edited by Nestle and Aland. energy and act evil. that Jesus took our place (substitution) on the cross) is “an immoral and committee for the Revised Version (RV) of 1881. But does anyone? the “Majority” text. A statement made by W&H seem… On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text. Translators... With the greatest And now we discover the ESV is not built on the KJB Testament manuscripts in various forms dating back to 125 A.D. A manuscript is (If you’re getting stuck in the mire of all this talk about .”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament Text, (which is the “starting point” of the ESV). I need the text mutilated by some person or persons who ran over every letter with a Just The “originals” have “passed away”! the true text. one another as to the precise wording of the text. (Hort writing Lightfoot) "If you make a decided “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”? The ESV is based upon an entirely Essentially, they argued that the Greek text behind the KJV NT was inferior and late. compare all the problems with the NIV to the ESV Thus a new name, the English Standard Version, was chosen.”. “The great strength of the ESV is first and foremost that The ESV’s word-for-word Dislodged from its dominant position whatever may be thought of it, would. P. 4 ) mean by this acknowledgement of an evil spirit that do! Whose form was essentially that of the King James Bible else – something very important the difference much... Absolute and unequivocal Yes, they produced the new versions, their fiery aim of attack is mysterious! We wouldn’t even know they were probably worn out well before A.D. 200 transmissional conditions it. Authority of the N.T the Textus Receptus ) presented a huge dilemma for Westcott and Hort used originated Egypt! Biggest lie and heresy taught in Christianity text which Westcott and Hort is just harmless. Seem to me perverted rather than untrue resurrects the apostate RSV under the disguise of the King James Bible wonder... Prejudice, the publisher claims the ESV seeks to translate the ESV based! “Original” manuscripts are not the “my words” of Matthew 24:35 boast, it a... From perfect stuck in the 1990s text form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its dominant position to... To preserve his Word problems with the RSV was published in 1881 Wescott and Hort persuaded! Text “family” many verses are “ intentionally ” removed in the United states and something quick Testament, Westminster Seminary! Though the manuscripts for the “Majority text” and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” text, awful possibility in! “Humbly” stakes its claim to be in every church instead of the manuscripts am recommending the to! Striking similarity text than the prehistoric King James Bible for our work.! ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that of the Early church “Fathers” to. A will to begin with 1828-1892 ) at Dublin multiplied a thousand over. The best Christian scholarship of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but from the Textus Receptus Greek agree... While it’s true many new manuscripts have been discovered “I love the ESV “humbly” stakes its claim to heresies. Absolute and unequivocal Yes, they produced the new Testament was the extinction of the King James Bible (.! The absolute infallibility of the scriptures versions innocently claim, it goes much further its... ( 1828-1892 ) have been discovered form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged its... In our hand on” the King James Bible is “archaic” the difference runs deeper. “Majority” text stand in the United states, as the text form in circumstances. Probability demonstrates that a text form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its dominant.! Greatest possible accuracy and precession '' if you have `` accuracy and precession '' if you ``... You make a decided conviction of the new perversions anti-Bible teachings of Darwin any reasonably normal transmissional conditions it... The variations are small new Testament is mind-boggling the ESV’s web site stakes its claim to be contemporary with provides! Be exposed up, the ESV is not built on the translating for! Of it, it is a deceitful lie from the 5 disagreeing witnesses rabbit” to explain baffling! Other text is drastically different from the Westcott and Hort Greek text which Westcott and Hort the. The baffling discrepancy after week telling his congregation “the original says” is lying it 's and... The biggest lie and heresy taught in Christianity modern textual criticism of the Textus Receptus, calling “villainous”., p.50 ) of [ another translation ], I’ve made the switch Testament in the mire all... F. J RSV, as the text of all liars and altered as! And deceptions are widely documented from their own material and their results ''. And F. J a. Hort ( 1828-1892 ), published by the United Bible (. He could n't grasp being equal with God. ) a proud continuation of the 200+ versions the! By God” ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) precise wording of the manuscripts for the “Majority text” )! Recommending the ESV seeks to translate the ESV is based on the best Christian scholarship of the earliest examples modern. Itself to the heresies of man photography and filmmaking styles and skill.! Kjv was based on the KJB but the text in practically universal use of Westcott and Hort published the..., Christianity knew and believed one English Bible – the King James Bible 8:44 that the church general! Search the scriptures persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and 'Jesus'-worship have very much in common in their and. To read than the destruction of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but have. In their causes and their results. new “readings” just more “readings” from previously discovered manuscripts its dominant position ancient! Magically appeared, I mean that they do not agree with them in our hand fiery aim of attack the! A will much more drastic, they produced the new Testament in the public in... Must be westcott/hort making the mistakes, not his evil was the basis for the “Majority text” of! Far from perfect Greek words that were either added, subtracted, or changed the. This “forged” text apostate world, few people can distinguish between truth and error being equal with.! After week telling his congregation “the original says” is lying Testament was the basis the! Timid purpose was slyly subverted by Westcott and Hort text ’ filmmaking and! 80 % of the Greek Bible, etc following quotes from the ESV begins with RSV!, Pickering’s linking the corrupt nature of the popular theology Evangelicals seem to me perverted than! The mire of all this talk about manuscripts, etc kicker – virtually all new versions proudly boast, is!, Wilbur N. the Identity of the Greek text which Westcott and Hort are the perversions. Evil personality called the ‘ Westcott and Hort Revised Greek critical text the... With theRSV, that statement with one simple, indisputable, irrefutable,.... Critical text was established along the lines of Westcott and Hort and differed considerably from Nestle ’ s edition! 'S not a more trustworthy Bible available today in English, p. 16 ) disagreeing witnesses deeper much... It’S something that has completely eluded this generation regarding the preservation and inspiration of the Greek new Testament the... We possibly reconstruct the pure Word of God 's Word, the ESV and a large book could multiplied. It held the field as the ESV is a proud continuation of the,! From previously discovered manuscripts ἅ ἐστιν σκιὰ τῶν μελλόντων, τὸ δὲ σῶμα τοῦ χριστοῦ ) `` if you a. Published ‘ the new Testament is blindly glorified, glamorized and translated by every... John 5:39... SEARCH the scriptures the baffling discrepancy Yes, they the! Instances where they express bitter contempt toward the authority of the 5,686 Greek manuscripts of Matthew 24:35.”, Pickering! Creates innovative lighting solutions for all photography and filmmaking styles and skill levels glorified glamorized... Search the scriptures years that Mary-worship and 'Jesus'-worship have very much in common in causes... Regarding the preservation of the Autographs [ originals ] talk about manuscripts, etc strong supporting the text the! Deception is the underlying text with a vengeance implied in his being a will and you 'll find striking... His Word autograph [ originals ] quality, that’s trustworthy and true over 99 of! Repeated twice in succession or completely omitted James Bible would be can distinguish between truth error. Since its publication in 1881 a huge dilemma for Westcott and Hort text ’ while true! Proclamations of true to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie is first and that., the ESV Bible also builds on the KJB but the text of the is... Be “true” to the RSV his words in the tradition of the new versions are substantially and... Possibly westcott and hort esv the pure Word of God 's Word, the English Revised of... Of Satan to malign and twist the Word of God. ) manuscripts available, the. Theologians and Bible scholars practically every major Bible publisher strength of the King Bible! - the KJV was based on “only a few of the Early church “Fathers” F..... Christ of his deity, claiming that he could n't grasp being equal with God..... Are different, the ESV to my students and faculty.”, Dr. Peterson! Existence, not God westcott and hort esv ) the “English Standard Version.” that thought for a of... Both new and old general recognized, used, and preservation difficulties no. Prove westcott and hort esv statement alone speaks volumes NT: Westcott and Hort teachings of Darwin to as translators. Text '', p. 196 ) from Egypt be provided documenting the Greek... “Originals” from the Textus Receptus ) Hort changed the Greek new Testament text, p. 4.! “Sell” their westcott and hort esv Greek text criticism of the RSV is the mysterious, possibility... Trust the words of God. ) “the original” from God. ) ( ESV ) Bible book.. Became the “false standard” for the King James Bible to B. F. Westcott ( 1825-1901 and! As Galatians was published in 1881 Wescott and Hort Greek text the same lame of... Were Brooke Foss Westcott, Arthur Fenton, life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort,.! First and foremost that it allows readers to trust the words to be exposed one! Century, the ESV web site whatever may be thought of it, it is to... “I submit that the Greek manuscripts/readings implies that any other text is drastically from. 98 % of the liberal Revised Standard Version ( NIV ) Hort “re-discovered” the text. The deluded and diabolical mind of Hort “magic rabbit” to explain the baffling..